| To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [AMPS] Henry 2K2 |
| From: | G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK) |
| Date: | Wed, 12 May 1999 22:59:56 +0100 |
Rich Measures wrote:
>>The cathode doesn't go strongly negative at all - it stays around
>>chassis potential, much as it would if the glitch resistor is in the
>>positive lead.
>
>? provided that the glitch-R is placed on the neg. side of the
>anode-current mete shunt-R. .
>
Agreed - that's the only location where it is equivalent to placing it
in the B+ lead.
>? Is there a tube manufacturer who does not recommend placing the
>glitch-R in the positive side of the anode supply?
>
Probably not. More to the point, is there a tube manufacturer who does
not recommend placing the glitch-R in the negative side either?
73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.demon.co.uk/g3sek
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [AMPS] heathkit spareparts, CP2235@aol.com |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [AMPS] Henry 2K2; glitch resistor in negative HV considerations, Ian White, G3SEK |
| Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Henry 2K2, Rich Measures |
| Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Henry 2K2, Rich Measures |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |