>
>IMPORTANT warning: "erronius" is erroneous!
>
? congrats on picking up on the spelling glitch.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rich Measures [SMTP:measures@vc.net]
>Sent: Monday, July 05, 1999 9:46 PM
>To: Richard W. Ehrhorn; 'n4kw@citrus.infi.net'
>Cc: amps@contesting.com
>Subject: RE: [AMPS]n4kw@citrus.infi.net RJ-iA relay contact-life on CW?
>
>
>>See notes interjected below {{ ----}}...
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Rich Measures [SMTP:measures@vc.net]
>>Sent: Monday, July 05, 1999 9:42 AM
>>To: Richard W. Ehrhorn; 'n4kw@citrus.infi.net'
>>Cc: amps@contesting.com
>>Subject: RE: [AMPS]n4kw@citrus.infi.net RJ-iA relay contact-life on CW?
>>
>? ? Warning: This document has erronius attribution marks.
(wrong attribution marks)
>..... SNIP ....
>
>Is this silly, or what?
(correct attribution marks)
? Various attribution level marks (>, >>, >>>, >>>>) help readers to
identify who said what when. With the e-mailer app. that I use, each
level appears in a different colour to facilitate identification. //
When a reply uses the same attribution marks for two speakers, something
is wrong with the e-mail app.
- cheers, Dick. . . Everybody makes mistakes.
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|