>
>Tom Rauch wrote:
>
>>Rich Measures wrote:
>>> ? For c. five years, the ARRL Handbook had the wrong Pi-L tank values -
>>> - despite being repeatedly told about the problem. .
>>
>>Is it easy to explain what is wrong about the values?
>>
>If we're talking about the same formulae, they were approximations that
>assumed a high loaded Q. They were probably good enough for designing
>output tank circuits, but gave major errors in Q values for cathode
>circuits with deliberately low loaded Qs.
? As I understand it, there was no error in the formulae, Ian.
.......
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|