Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

SV: [AMPS] Re:(AMPS) sb-200 troubles

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: SV: [AMPS] Re:(AMPS) sb-200 troubles
From: sm5ki@algonet.se (Hans Goldschmidt)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:36:50 +0200
Why not use another plate choke instead of the tiny receiving type normally
used? By the wy I saw  in  G3VA:s TECHNICALTOPICS SCRAPBOOK your eccellent
idea from 1988 feeding the anode supply at the antenna end
>
>>The safety choke should be matched to the primary CB's or fuses to be
>>robust enough to withstand the current fo the time it takes for the fuses
>>to blow.
>
>Certainly - no argument about what it SHOULD be! All too frequently, though,
>it isn't man enough for the job.
>
>73
>
>Peter G3RZP
>
>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>