Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] RE: Re: Re: Mission Impossible

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] RE: Re: Re: Mission Impossible
From: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se)
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 07:21:04 +0100

     Wait a sec. You say below that signals was clean but distorted
     due to too much speech processing.
     How can a signal be clean and distorted at the same time?
     Please explain.

     73, Jim SM2EKM
---------------------------------
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från:   Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com [SMTP:Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com]
Skickat:         den 7 mars 2000 18:49
Till:   itr@nanoteq.co.za; sm2cew@telia.com
Kopia:  amps@contesting.com
Ämne:   VB: RE: [AMPS] Re: Re: Mission Impossible


Peter says:

        >What we heard during the contest was genuinely poor signals from a
>number of stations, not receiver overload !

I reiterate that when I heard K1AR, both on 20 and 40, the signal was 
clean.

Some guys did appear to have too much speech processing, so the signal 
was
clean, but distorted. As Peter says, in many cases, it appears to be not
knowing how to use the knobs on the transceiver (turn clockwise gives 
more,
right?) But I didn't find so many of the named stations spreading to the
extent Peter did.


73

Peter G3RZP


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

 <<Fil: RE_ [AMPS] Re_ Re_ Mission Impossible.TXT>> 


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>