Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: Rich's article

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: Rich's article
From: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 23:24:16 -0700
>Rich, et al,
>
>I admit to being a pack rat when it comes to useful articles about RF
>amps.  Especially if they seem to address a subject that comes up
>repeatedly on the reflector.  Fred has brought up an interesting point,
>and I'd love to get this article into public view.  Thanks to my
>employer, it is relativly easy and quick (and free) for me to get pages
>turned into .jpg files, .pdf files, or any other standard graphics
>file.  Rich, if you'll snail mail me a photostatic copy of the article
>in question, I will scan it and provide readable files of it back to you
>for posting, or I'll post it on a site of my own, or send it to Skipp
>May for posting on his UD Davis site, or send it to Ian White for
>posting on his site or - any other publicly available site.
>
>I can't wait to see an entire article devoted to parasitic suppression,
>with dozens of graphics.  This is probably a true gem.

For some, G. W. Fyler's article is probably not going to  enhance their 
''expert'' rating.  
>
>Let me know how I can help.
>
>Regards,
>
>Dave W8NF
>
>
A xerox copy goes out tomorrow, Dave.  .  

-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>