Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] exciter to amp coax length

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] exciter to amp coax length
From: ki7rw@arrl.net (Lee Roberts)
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:35:50 -0700
My tube and solid state amp has *input* adjustments for all bands. I
suppose these adjustments are designed to compensate for these
mismatches?

>From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Date: 3/10/00  10:20:15AM
>To: "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting.com>
>CC: amps@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] exciter to amp coax length
>
>
>> Sure, and in this case the original indicated input SWR was more
>like
>> 1.5:1 than 1:1, hence the length of feedline mattered.  I'd still
>like to
>> know why a higher indicated SWR (on the TS-930) translated to
>higher
>> output, plate current and grid current on that one band, but for
>now it's
>> enough just to have things back behaving normally...
>
>Most solid state rigs are conjugately matched at an impedance 
>higher than 50 ohms. That's so the rig will remain linear if the
>load 
>impedance is slightly above 50 ohms.
>
>The only penalty is excessive current in the exciter's PA stage 
>when driving lower impedance loads, and a slight loss of efficiency 
>driving low Z loads.
>
>Ignoring SWR shutdown systems, most broadband exciters like to 
>see an impedance somewhat higher than 50 ohms.
>
>
>73, Tom W8JI
>w8ji@contesting.com
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>