>
>No never give up, do you? Rich. Again: " the proof of the pudding is in the
>eating.......". It has been proofed many times that the DAF works and that
>is what counts, right?
>
I agree that the DAF config. works, Hans. The total distortion level
produced by the three DAFs I ''proofed''/measured was no better than 22
db below PEP. As long as one stays c. 25kHz from the amateur-service
band edges, this sort of thing is quite legal. However, my personal
preference is to use amplifiers that have a total distortion level of
-32db or better. .
later
>sooner............ de Hans SM5KI
>----------
>>FrÂn: measures <2@vc.net>
>>Till: <Jan.E.Holm@telia.se>, "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
>>?mne: Re: [AMPS] Re: New G2DAF amplifier information
>>Datum: ons 15 mar 2000 06.23
>>
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why the heck not? People I know runing G2DAF
>>> amps do sound much better and also have less
>>> bandwith then big time prominent hall of fame
>>> contesters using Alpha/Ameritron amps and
>>> latest so called state of the art exciters.
>>> Whats wrong here?
>>
>>You are not telling us the truth. Running substantial grid current in
>>grid-driven amps makes feculence as surely as the sun rises in the East
>>and sets in the West. On the other hand, for clearing a wide path, the
>>DAF is unsurpassed. .
>>
>>cheers
>>......
>>
>>- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
>>end
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|