To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 23:46:20 -0500
>To: "Jim Reid" <kh7m@hsa-kauai.net>amps
>From: Bill Aycock <baycock@HIWAAY.NET>
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do?
>In-Reply-To: <000201c01d3b$4427aa20$aa7ad818@gw400>
>References: <200009121453.e8CEr6C05035@paris.akorn.net>
<3.0.5.32.20000912222009.007dc360@HIWAAY.NET>
>
>Jim- long post, with only a few things I either know about or have an
opinion on-
>see interspersed stuff below
>
>At 06:29 PM 9/12/00 -1000, you wrote:
>>
>>> Autopsies are still dependant on interpretation and
>>> imagination as to causes of damage.
>
>My main reference was to "crispy-critter" switches- they appear to have
had arc damage, but the interpretation of the cause of the arc is up in the
air.
>>
>>Speaking of which, Rich was to have rcvd some tubes
>>for just that purpose on the weekend. Did I miss the
>>results while I was out pouting?
>
>I have seen no report- either he didn't get them, or the results were not
in his favor.
>>
>>Rich keeps wanting to know who designed the "origianal"
>>AL-80. I presume the implication is that Tom did. So
>>what?
>
>Shows you how interpretations vary- I first saw the question just after
Tom said Rich had never designed a comercial amp- I assumed Rich had been
the designer, and was trying to get Tom to admit an ERROR.
>>
>>I also asked Rich to send me the e-mail to which he keeps
>>referring from sometime in 1996. All I wanted to read
>>was the ONE post to which he continues to refer where
>>Tom made some great ERROR, per Rich.
>>
>Rich will rarely post a complete item- he prefers to take things out of
context. I have had several posts from other readers that had some of
those- they do not support what Rich keeps saying.
>
>>But, what I rcvd was enough reading material to last
>>from now into next year sometime -- you wouldn't believe
>>how many e-mails, and all the headers and indentations
>>as they overran the formats of the various "old" email
>>programs being used in those days, etc.! I do not want
>>to read all this same stuff we read to day, as it was
>>also expressed 4 years ago. All I wanted was the ONE
>>key problem point to which Rich continually berates
>>at Tom!
>>
>>So, I am no better off than before in my attempt to really
>>understand what Rich continually refers to. If it is some
>>aura, spread out across months of back and forth e-mails,
>>that will do me, at least, absolutely no benefit.
>>
>>As to the format of the debate today, Rich ALWAYS includes
>>all the preceding threat re-posts, or what ever they are called,
>>with usually only a few cryptic words somewhere along the
>>long, long way, or right at the very end!!
>
>He thinks being cryptic is cute. If he is ambiguous enough, he can claim
anything, later.
>
>>That is why this thread on this reflector can become so
>>confounded irritating!! R-sup vs. Rs vs. Q is/is not important,
>>vs. ............ SO WHAT are your attempting to achieve, Rich????
>>
>>To completely and absolutely "trash" Tom R. ??? If so,
>>for what possible useful to the world reason? I guess
>>just for your own ego purpose ......
>
>I think he blaims Tom for having gotten him booted from participating in
the amps write-up for ARRL, or some such thing- His vehemance is
astounding, and bitter enough for it to have been something major.
>>
>>Jim, KH7M
>>
>>
>Bill- W4BSG
>>
>>
-
Bill Aycock --- Persimmon Hill
Woodville, Alabama, US 35776
(in the N.E. corner of the State)
W4BSG -- Grid EM64vr
baycock@HiWAAY.net
w4bsg@arrl.net
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|