>
>***snip***
>>Any copy of Bill Orr's or the ARRL Handbook have this info in a nice
>>table-type format. These valuable reference tools also have the
>>answers to about 75% of the questions asked here on the reflector.
>
>response:
>And if "Any copy of Bill Orr's or the ARRL Handbook have this info in a nice
>table-type format. These valuable reference tools also have the answers to
>about 75% of the questions asked here on the reflector." had been provided
>as an answer I would have thought. . .that was useful and we have helped
>someone along the path of enlightenment. . .
I can not recall seeing Orr talk about the effect of tuned input Q in G-G
amplifiers.
>
>***snip****_______________________________
>>
>> Cheap shot.
>
>response:
>Rich is no candy ass. . .he can and will speak for himself. I respect his
>opinion and have benefitted from his extensive knowledge. Don't mistake
>constructive criticism aimed at all members of the group for inappropriate
>behavior. We have seen several instances of inappropriate behavior so I
>understand the confusion.
>
Fishing for lapdogs requires cutting bait.
>There is no way to estimate the number of list members who don't post or
>unsubscribe because of technocratic or unwelcoming responses. However, I
>suspect it is a significant number. As a result we lose part of our
>experience base. There is no way to quantify that loss. Once again, I
>suspect it is significant.
>
My guess on the matter is that readership of the AMPS archive is
substantial.
cheers, Art
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|