Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] SB200 Retrofit

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] SB200 Retrofit
From: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:31:17 -0700
>
>***snip***
>>Any copy of Bill Orr's or the ARRL Handbook have this info in a nice
>>table-type format. These valuable reference tools also have the
>>answers to about 75% of the questions asked here on the reflector.
>
>response:
>And if "Any copy of Bill Orr's or the ARRL Handbook have this info in a nice
>table-type format. These valuable reference tools also have the answers to
>about 75% of the questions asked here on the reflector." had been provided
>as an answer I would have thought. . .that was useful and we have helped
>someone along the path of enlightenment. . .

I can not recall seeing Orr talk about the effect of tuned input Q in G-G 
amplifiers.  
>
>***snip****_______________________________
>>
>> Cheap shot.
>
>response:
>Rich is no candy ass. . .he can and will speak for himself. I respect his
>opinion and have benefitted from his extensive knowledge. Don't mistake
>constructive criticism aimed at all members of the group for inappropriate
>behavior. We have seen several instances of inappropriate behavior so I
>understand the confusion.
>
Fishing for lapdogs requires cutting  bait.  

>There is no way to estimate the number of list members who don't post or
>unsubscribe because of technocratic or unwelcoming responses. However, I
>suspect it is a significant number. As a result we lose part of our
>experience base. There is no way to quantify that loss. Once again, I
>suspect it is significant.
>
My guess on the matter is that readership of the AMPS archive is 
substantial.   

cheers, Art

-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>