Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

SV: [AMPS] SB-220 Glitch Resistor ???

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: SV: [AMPS] SB-220 Glitch Resistor ???
From: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 07:41:30 -0500


Date sent:              Thu, 30 Nov 2000 09:43:08 +0000
To:                     amps@contesting.com
From:                   "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.com>
Send reply to:          "Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com>
Subject:                Re: SV: [AMPS] SB-220 Glitch Resistor ???

> 
> Wilbert Knol wrote:
> >
> >
> >> With the glitch R in the negative return, the cathode circuitry may be
> >> driven to several kV by a B+ to chassis arc.  
> >
> >Good point.
> >
> >I don't like the idea of most of the HT appearing across the filament
> >transformer secondary...
> >
> Does it?

The same fellow who always proclaims a "glitch resistor" in the grid 
is a good idea, now finds fault with a resistor in the B-.

A glitch resistor in the B- only would cause the negative terminal at 
the HV rectifier and filter cap junction to go up towards HV + rail, 
everything on the chassis and cathode side of the resistor could be 
fully clamped to ground and remain so just as a resistor in the HV 
line would allow. It would make no difference at all!!!

On the other hand if the grid in a triode is floated through a 
resistance any HV faults in the tube would be passed right along to 
the filament/cathode circuit, yet that is supposed to be a "good 
idea".

Odd.


73, Tom W8JI
w8ji@contesting.com

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>