Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Review of antenna tuner from Dayton

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Review of antenna tuner from Dayton
From: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:07:34 -0700
>
>Tom says:
>
>>I'm amazed so many people buy tuners instead of building them, or 
>>using stubs.
>
>Here we definitely agree. Starting from the R + jX you need to match, a
>dedicated tuner can be designed to have the lowest operating Q for a 
>particular
>impedance transformation ratio.
>
>
>       >but moving the balun to the input of the tuner does NOT help balance
>
>Just how well balanced are the loads anyway? I suspect that generally, 
>probably
>to around 10% mismatch isn't uncommon.. i.e. the impedances from each side to
>ground don't match by 10% or possibly more.
>
/\  My guess is more due to proximity effect of buildings, trees, bushes, 
on and on.  Thid is where the input coax-choke/balanced-L design shines.

>
>       >Tuners are probably one of the most difficult pieces of gear to 
>       >engineer, because the frequency and impedance ranges are so 
>      >wide.
>
>This is because the commercial tuner has to be an egg laying, milk and wool
>producing flying pig that swims. ...

/\   hear, hear.

cheers

-  R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>