Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] 3-500Z

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] 3-500Z
From: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 20:46:31 -0700
>
>Rich replied to me directly with more of the same, and appended this
>question to the end. I have seen the original quote he took this from. I
>dont believe he has the guts to give an accurate copy of the original
>reference, in toto.
>
//  Please post it here.

>Yes- I believe AC circuit analysis works when properly applied to ANY
>circuit with alternating currents flowing in it. 

//  Mr. Rauch apparently does not agree.  [Grate Debate archive >22 Nov., 
1996]

> Note- there is a LOT
>implied in the word "properly". Additionally, I said I believe it works-
>not that I could do it. (Hint).
>
//  It's not as difficult as it may look, Bill.  Since L and R are in 
parallel, it's easier for me to work as a conductance problem.

cheers, Bill

>At 05:04 PM 9/28/01 -0700, you wrote:
>>>
>>
>>//   Bill -- Do you believe that AC Circuit Analysis does not work with 
>>L/R parasitic suppressors?  
>>
>>-  R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
>>end
>>
>>
>-
>Bill Aycock   ---   Persimmon Hill 
> Woodville, Alabama, US 35776
> (in the N.E. corner of the State)
>      W4BSG   --   Grid EM64vr
>        baycock@HiWAAY.net
>             w4bsg@arrl.net
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>


-  R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>