[Amps] IMD vs. Vcc

To:	<amps@contesting.com>
Subject:	[Amps] IMD vs. Vcc
From:	Mike Sawyer" <kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer)
Date:	Mon, 1 Apr 2002 19:16:15 -0500

Tom said: Second, you can not cause harmful QRM outside of the normal 
occupied bandwidth allocated for that mode. (A3J means 3kHz 
wide) 
 I would like to know where it says that in Part 97. I have gotten into many 
arguments about this, since I enjoy running AM. There is nothing in Part 97 
that specifies bandwidth per mode other than within the actual sub-band itself. 
Mike(y)
W3SLK

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Roger D. Johnson [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, wlfuqu00@uky.edu [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Richard [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Terry Gaiser [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Tom Rauch [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Terry Gaiser [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, <kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer) <= [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, <K4XL@arrl.net (Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL) [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Terry Gaiser [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Bill Weinel [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Richard [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, John [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Richard [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Richard [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Radio WC6W [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Terry Gaiser [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Gary Schafer

Previous by Date:	[Amps] rotten splatter/ IMD vs. Vcc, John
Next by Date:	[Amps] Re: [Amps] Bird® 43 Manual, Ron
Previous by Thread:	[Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Terry Gaiser
Next by Thread:	[Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, <K4XL@arrl.net (Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL)
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]