Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] re: CTI screen regulator, tubes vs solid state

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] re: CTI screen regulator, tubes vs solid state
From: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard)
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 01:08:23 -0700
*  Alex:  His claim of 1200w-pep from a pair of 4cx250Bs is quite Simply 
above the tube mfg's ratings.  

>Well, he probably followed your advice not to complicate the matters
>and as a minimalist that he is, he just had overdone it a bit :)
>
>A true KISS man :)
>
>Alex
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: amps-admin@contesting.com [mailto:amps-admin@contesting.com]On
>> Behalf Of Tom Rauch
>> Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 9:34 PM
>> To: amps@contesting.com; skipp isaham
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] re: CTI screen regulator, tubes vs solid state
>> 
>> 
>> The URL worked today, must have been a network problem.
>> 
>> Look at this text........
>> 
>> Triodes are Good, Tetrodes are Better.... 
>> voltage, and that is a good system.
>> 
>
>
>Big SNIP
>
>
>
>>    
>> 
>> 73, Tom W8JI
>> W8JI@contesting.com 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>> 
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>


-  R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, 
www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>