>2 wrote:
>>
>>
>>>While rooting around inside the SB-1000, I checked the carbon resistor
>>>in the paralytic choke... good as new.
>>>
>>** What was the measured resistance? // I have found that intermittent
>>vhf parasites are so brief they can damage the element of a carbon-comp
>>resistor without exhibiting damage to the moulded case. Thus, a
>>new-appearing carbon-comp resistor can have several times more ohms than
>>its specified value.
>>
>I'm aware of that, so I unsoldered the resistor and measured the
>value... good as new.
>
>
>
>>>The RF choke and bypass caps were there as standard. Since the screwy
>>>meter readings were only on one band (the lowest) I put it down to RF
>>>rectification rather than purely threshold voltage.
>>>
>>** In your opinion, is 88-ohms of XC an acceptable bypass for c. 1A-rms
>>of RF current?
>>...
>
>There are thousands of amps, of many different kinds, that seem to work
>fine with 0.001uF. That evidence has a large influence on my opinion.
>
** I am influnced by the (X x I) V-drop from c.1A passing through an
88-ohm reactance.
- R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K,
www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
|