>Regarding the "discussions" between two individuals, one other possibility
>(other than two personalities fighting it out over pointless matters) is
>that one of the persons is wrong and the other one is trying to help educate
>other members of the Reflector by taking the time to point out errors.
>Unless errors are challenged and corrected, they tend to become gospel.
>
Good point.
>Although the statements recently made by the individuals are pointed, they
>contain enough information for us to choose to believe one or the other - or
>at least question what we hear. If nothing else than causing us to think
>ourselves, it may prove highly useful.
>
My guess is that most of the kvetchers are of the opinion that vhf/uhf
parasitics are a myths, that feedback-C is so puny it can safely be
ignored, and that the real amplifier experts are those who claim they are.
>The great debate about the O-ring of the first shuttle disaster was very
>personal at times - even vindictive. Finally, science overcame
>personalities - but only because those who had differeng views spoke out.
>Knowledge is not necessarily painless.
>
The differing views seem to have been squelched by the chillingly brief
O-ring in ice-water demo.
- The current debate over the Colombia "anomaly" seems to contain some
vindictiveness too, Colin.
cheerz
>Colin K7FM
>
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/03
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
- R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734, AG6K,
www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
|