>2 wrote:
>>
>>However, the tradeoff with ceramic tubes is that they are rated for
>>"Amplifier and Oscillator Service" to higher frequencies, so there
>>could still be surprises lurking about,. For example, the 3-500Z is
>>rated at 110MHz and it has 0.15pF of feedback C. Since the 8877 has
>>only 0.1pF of feedback C, it would seem to be a more stable device. The
>>sticky-wicket is that the 8877 is rated at several times the amp/osc
>>frequency of the 3-500Z, so the 8877 actually has fewer reactive ohms
>>of feedback at its F-max than does the 3-500Z. However, although this
>>may be bad news for amplifier builders, for oscillator builders, it's
>>good news.
>>
>Yawn... here we go again...
>
>Feedback C is significant, but is only one of the factors that determine
>VHF stability. The factor that is usually more important is the length
>and inductance from grid to ground.
>
>When there are no other feedback paths except through the tube, and the
>grid ring is grounded directly to the chassis by a finger-stock, an 8877
>amp can be unconditionally stable at all VHF frequencies - that means
>stable with any input or output loads (or none) in any combination.
** I have autopsied 6 gold-sputtered 8877s from HF amplifiers that used
the Eimac 135305 grid-grounding collet. [ref Figure 24 on my Web site]
The inductance of an 8877 grid + base flange appears to be c. 15nH. The
collet appears to have c. 7nH.
>
>Thousands of 8877 VHF amps out there can testify to that.
** I know of no case of VHF/UHF gold-sputtering in other than HF
amp;ifiers
>
>--
>73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
> Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
>http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
- R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734, AG6K,
www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
|