>On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:50:33 -0500, <kayser@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>There is in some ways a genius in the 110/220 decision so many years ago.
>
>_________________________________________________________
>
>Too bad they went with a relatively low frequency. 400 Hz is widely
>used in aircraft and has numerous advantages.
*** But not for long-distance power transmission.
>In fact, if they would
>go to ~1000 Hz, electrocution would become a thing of the past. The
>human nervous system can not sense an electric shock when the
>frequency is higher than 600-700 Hz or so. One could still get a
>nasty burn, but think how many lives would be saved.
>
>OT, to be sure.
>
>--
>Bill, W6WRT
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|