Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] IMD & ALC's

To: "craig" <craigs99@iprimus.com.au>, " AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] IMD & ALC's
From: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 00:20:14 -0800
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>

>Hi Rich
>
>I have not read or seen data on the ALC overshoot  problems. The ARRL
>reviews seem to politely ignore  the issue. 

**  I see c. 20% overshoot on my TS-440S on the first syllable.  Running 
almost no ALC helps.  

>My main interest in this area is
>too emit the cleanest possible signal. Its becoming a uphill battle to find
>a new model radio with a clean transmitter without ALC,  key clicks and bad
>IMD problems.

**  Without some form of ALC, excess IMD is a virtual guarantee --  
unless the operator religiously rides herd on the mic gain comtrol.  
>
>I have become sensitive to the problem because here in VK  the bands are now
>awash with stations running these new Russians Tetrode Emtron amplifiers
>with low drive levels to achieve 400 watts output. The leading edge splatter
>and ALC overshoot is very common. 

**  The solution is to run just enough mic gain and adjust the drive 
and/or grid-bias potential until no grid-current flows - especially on 
the syllable that trips the VOX.  .

>Another problem is that the RF actuated
>EBS in these amps are poorly designed, something you have mentioned in the
>past.  It would not be such a bad problem if the rigs had good IMD and
>proper power control without overshoot.

**  RF-actuated EBS is an idea that looks workable on paper but one which 
doesn't work acceptably in practice because the EBS switches in and out 
of non-linear bias during soft-syllables.   Synchronizing the EBS with 
the RF-relays is clearly the best approach - even though it requires two, 
additional wires from the transceiver to the amplifier's RL Control 
circuit.   As I see it, even with a  radio that had no overshoot and 
pristine IMD, RF-actuated EBS would still have the problem of generating 
IMD (and harsh-sounding audio)  by rapidly switching in and out of 
non-linear bias during soft-syllables.   
>
>
>By the way hows your dummy load project coming along? 

**  The 50-ohm, 2 by 18 inch Type-SP resistor arrived from 
Kanthal-Globar.  Next step is a trip to the plumbing store for some  
sewer pipe and 2 garden hose fittings for the water  in and out 
connections.  I am going to build a 1500v-max 1000 to 1 voltage-divider 
into the input to allow direct measurement of the peak RF voltage across 
50-ohms with an oscilloscope.  This is the only PEP measurement that I 
trust after years of working in calibration labs..

>I have a 2 X  12 inch
>resistor  sitting here that would probably work well.  I will be waiting to
>see how your project goes.
>
**  The 18-incher is probably overkill, but the new-price difference was 
minimal.

cheers, Craig


>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "R. Measures" <r@somis.org>
>To: "craig" <craigs99@iprimus.com.au>; " AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
>Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 2:45 AM
>Subject: Re: [Amps] IMD & ALC's
>
>
>> **  Good one, Craig.  One problem is trying to convince the ignorant that
>> mo' ALC is not mo' betta.  Another problem is manufacturer's owners'
>> manuals which recommend using a certain level of ALC. - such as
>> mid-scale.
>> -  Have you seen a study on overshoot level in various transceivers?
>>
>> >Here is a great link discussing the IMD performance of modern radios and
>> >poor ALC design. Some very interesting IMD measurements on some radios.
>> >
>> >http://antennspecialisten.se/~sm5bsz/dynrange/alc.htm
>> >
>> >Craig
>> >VK3HE
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Amps mailing list
>> >Amps@contesting.com
>> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>