To: | "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] SB-220 |
From: | Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com> |
Date: | Wed, 03 Nov 2004 13:58:51 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Steve, That's the way I always looked at it too. But, and here's a big but, I read a few webpages that says VHF oscillations are a bunch of bologna. These very authors was or still might be high up in the ARRL, I'm not sure, and did work for, or still do, the amp manufacturers. They say that it's impossible and that it couldn't cause arcing in components. Now to me, if the lead(s) length is correct, and the gain high enough, the internal capacitance of the tube along with the inductance of the lead(s) could make up a VHF oscillator. Another thing is that most tank circuits in production amps are hand wired. The lead lengths aren't strictly controlled so they cant tell from one to another if they hit the sweet spot or not! It would look to me that over this many years of using parasitic suppressors, and having found direct formulas for them from a lot of experimentation, anything that says VHF oscillation don't exist would have been caught. As far as I know, the ones saying it doesn't happen has only been in the past few years. I would think that 60+ years is a loooong time to go before catching it? From this, I'd like to hear a good discussion and or debate about it. Best & 73's Will Matney Steve Thompson wrote: On Wednesday 03 November 2004 18:23, Will Matney wrote:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] SB-220, Pete Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] SB-220, R . Measures |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] SB-220, Steve Thompson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] SB-220, R . Measures |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |