Re: [Amps] Websites.

["Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>]

Peter,

I wrote it mainly so that the member here, or any others, will always  
research things from several sources. I have seen several websites with  
mis-information on subjects although there heart was in it for the right  
reason. The other portion of the statement was about using computer grade  
electrolytics, and saying they shouldn't be used. However, there are low  
ESR computer grade caps, so the text shouldn't disclude all these type  
caps. Even at that, the standard computer grades have been used all the  
time with some pretty darn long life to them. Even though the use of low  
ESR types are better, they are more expensive. So things ought to be  
weighed when building a circuit. When I said, "This makes one wonder if  
they can be trusted on everything else
they have spoken about.", I was speaking of the website author, and meant  
that they should research things and only write what is known to be true.  
It wasn't meant to be derogatory, but that one needs to watch the text for  
any other mis-information. The member here was looking for help and ran  
across some mis-information in the texts and may or may not have known it.  
On here, the voice of the many can rectify this and provide an answer  
which is correct. There's one old saying I keep in mind, "It never does  
hurt to ask".

Best,

Will



On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:36:09 -0500, donii@sympatico.ca  
<donii@sympatico.ca> wrote:

> Wil
> Glad you made that intervention. As far as I know << Electro Static  
> Resistance  >> isn't even a an electronic unit.
> Better be warned than hurt
> PeterVE2FAR



--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps