Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Fwd: Pi-L In-circuit Adjustment Question

To: "amps-contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Fwd: Pi-L In-circuit Adjustment Question
From: George KB2Z <Thermionic_Emission@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 10:21:39 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I thought it was maximum transfer of energy. when xl = xc.

At 03:03 PM 2/20/05 +0000, you wrote:

>G3rzp@aol.com wrote:
> > In a message dated 20/02/2005 10:34:05 GMT Standard Time, r@somis.org
> > writes:
> >
> > A  Pi-network is not resonant because it is two L-networks in series,
> > and  L-networks never operate  at resonance.
> >
> >
> >
> > This depends upon your definition of resonance. The only definition
> > that is mathematically applicable to all tuned circuits is that the
> > applied voltage
> > and  current are in phase. Under these circumatances pi and L
> > networks are resonant.
>Surely any definition of resonance has to cover all branches of physics,
>including weights on springs, air columns in tubes etc. My maths is too
>rusty to work from the fundamental definition to see what it means in
>electronics terms, but what ever it is, it's the one that's indisputable.
>
>Steve
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 14/02/05
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 2/14/05

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>