Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] Fingerprint revisited

To: <Amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] Fingerprint revisited
From: "Gene Bigham" <jbigham2@kc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:15:24 -0600
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
It seems to be a dead horse but I am gonna beat it anyway.  If something like a 
fingerprint on the outside of the 3-500Z tube envelope could damage its thick 
glass under normal operations, other than being a negative aesthetic thing, 
then why do the tubes have trademark and identification imprints on them by 
design?  At the risk of starting another thread, I see more fingerprints in the 
oxide that forms on my silver plated parts in the amp.  Fortunately silver 
oxide is conductive unlike its copper, iron, and aluminum counterparts.
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Amps] Fingerprint revisited, Gene Bigham <=