Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 4CX1000A for SSB??

Subject: Re: [Amps] 4CX1000A for SSB??
From: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:20:33 +0100
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I sample 10 sec´s and use 200 Hz BW. It is really interesting
to see how bad some radios are that way.
Some 100W radios using 12-16V final transistors really shouldn´t
be run at more then 50W output to show normal bandwith for a
SSB signal, sure is difficult to convince all FT1000MP owners
about this fact.
A two tone test might be good in some respects but it will ofcourse
not tell you the bandwith of your signal.

73 SM2EKM
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Bill Fuqua wrote:
> Ok, I just took a look at this and see where the problem is.
> With a resolution bandwidth of 3kHz the  3 order IMD products are masked by 
> the real signal. For example if you should have a 14.2815 MHz signal and a 
> 14.282 Signal producing 14.2825, you will not see the 14.2825 MHz signal 
> because it will be a tiny bit added to the 14.282 signal in the spectrum 
> analyzer's detector.  What you need to do is to reduce the RBW to say 500 
> Hz or a bit less and sample longer (a lot of talking)until you get the full 
> spectrum filled in as you did before. And you should see a difference. In 
> fact since the bandwidth of the SSB signal is only 2.5kHz or so wide to 
> start with you will most likely not see any IMD products using a 3kHz 
> resolution bandwidth. A 2 tone test is good because it is easier to compare 
> results but there is nothing wrong with what you are doing.  You in fact 
> could do a infinite tone test (random noise source) and perhaps get results 
> that would be easier to compare to others if they should try it.
> 
> 73
> Bill wa4lav
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>