Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] CW and High Voltage

To: "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>, "Steven Cook" <sccook1@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] CW and High Voltage
From: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 02:19:21 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Your latter is best because as you reduce drive, you reduce plate I, which 
increases the PLI, which needs to see different C1 and C2, assuming that you 
don't have a roller inductor.  Seems to me that on a 2K-4 one of the C's is 
switchable and you tune the other C and the L.

Bob
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steven Cook" <sccook1@cox.net>
To: <Amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 1:50 AM
Subject: [Amps] CW and High Voltage


> Team,
>
> I've acquired an older Henry 2K-4, which only has one High Voltage setting 
> ~ 3500V no load.
>
> It runs a pair of 3-500z triodes and will be driven with ~100W
>
> My question concerns running the amp at reduced output on CW and if it is 
> better to:
>
> 1.  Apply full drive, and adjust C1 and C2 until the desired level of 
> output is achieved...
>
> or as some have suggested:
>
> 2.  Apply full drive, adjust C1 and C2 until maximum power is achieved, 
> then reduce the exciter drive without readjusting C1 or C2.
>
> What is the ramification of starting out with reduced drive, (like 25 or 
> 50 Watts) and adjusting C1 and C2 until maximum output is achieved?
>
> Less harmonic attenuation?  Some other undesirable effect?
>
> I'm curious because I've heard both approaches suggested and wonder what 
> the benefit or deleterious effect might be of one method vs. the other.
>
> Your thoughts...
>
> Steve (WG7K)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>