Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] why 3-500Z?

To: "R. Measures" <r@somis.org>, amps@contesting.com
Subject: [Amps] why 3-500Z?
From: "John T. M. Lyles" <jtml@lanl.gov>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 12:29:29 -0600
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
We have no more good 3-400Z's, a box of duds left. I have 6 sockets 
for these tubes that must operate 24/7 all year, so cannot afford to 
wait for someone to start producing 3-400z again.....

Ciao
John
K5PRO

>On Sep 29, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Peter Chadwick wrote:
>
>>Rich said
>>
>>>In pulse service. 3-500Zs offer virtually no advantage over 3-400Zs.
>>
>>Electrically, this almost certainly true. But how about price and
>>availability?
>
>The issue is about changing out good 3-400Zs for 3-500Zs.
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>