Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean

To: "peter.voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>,<amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean
From: "Tom Cathey" <K1JJ@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:30:10 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
> One reasons the class A amp capability proved to be >negative was probably 
> the fact that the transistors de >soldered by themselves on extensive use 
> That happened >to two friends of mine...
> 73
> Peter
-------------------

Vely, bery interesting, Peter!   I passed that info along to my friend who 
is considering the MP.  With what particular rig was this a problem?

I am also thinking of selling my highly modified FT-1000D to pick up a 
closed-out  FT-1000MP Mk 5,  "at the low low price" of $2150.

I like the built-in 75W class A feature - wud save me some work on my amp 
project. However, I have dual diversity RX capability in my FT-1000D now. 
75M Beverage and Yagi in stereo. Outstanding.  Does anyone know if an MP can 
be easily modifed to do true RX diversity? It wud require a separate antenna 
input, 2nd  RX and stereo headphone output. And a synced VFO controlling 
both RX's.

The MP's 6M feature is nice too. I had to modify my 1000D to take a 
transverter in/out.

BTW, I find it funny that an FT-1000D is over 15 years older and still sells 
USED for as much as this new MP. I wonder if the marketplace is telling me 
to keep what I have?  :-))

73,
Tom, K1JJ


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>