Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] Pi vs Pi-L

To: amps@contesting.com (Amps)
Subject: [Amps] Pi vs Pi-L
From: jkearman@att.net (Jim Kearman)
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:15:53 +0000
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
My understanding of current FCC regs is
*    the mean power of any spurious emission from HF transmitters or external 
RF power amplifiers installed after January 1, 2003, must be at least 43 dB 
below the mean power of the fundamental emission.
*    the mean power of any spurious emission from HF transmitters or external 
RF power amplifiers installed on or before January 1, 2003, must not exceed 50 
mW and must be at least 40 dB below the mean power of the fundamental emission. 
If the mean power output of such as transmitter is less than 5 W, the 
attenuation must be at least 30 dB.
Still exempt from the provisions of §97.307(d) are transmitters built before 
April 15, 1977, or those first marketed before January 1, 1978. 

I don't believe a pi net of Qo 12-15 can achieve -43 dBc suppression of the 
second harmonic. The numbers I'm coming up with are an order of magnitude 
worse. So, shouldn't any new amplifier design include a pi-L tank, or external 
lowpass or bandpass filtering?

73,

Jim, KR1S
http://kr1s.kearman.com/
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>