Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] figuring tube output impedance

To: "Partain, Chuck" <Chuck_Partain@maxtor.com>,"Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] figuring tube output impedance
From: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:01:07 -0800
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Where ever you are they will hear you (clearly) from there. ;<)
73,
Gary...wa6fgi


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Partain, Chuck" <Chuck_Partain@maxtor.com>
To: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>; <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] figuring tube output impedance


> yea they're going to love me.
>
> and I guess with that line of thinking, I should drive home doing 145 in 
> the 40.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Turner [mailto:dezrat@copper.net]
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 3:37 PM
> To: Partain, Chuck; amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] figuring tube output impedance
>
>
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> At 10:36 AM 2/27/2006, Partain, Chuck wrote:
>
>>I run 3.9kv and I'm GUESSING 2 amp.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> I'm GUESSING the FCC will be very interested in your amp.
>
> Even at a lousy 50% efficiency that is 3900 watts output.
>
> Bill, W6WRT
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> 


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>