Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] A plea for fewer acronyms

To: <Amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] A plea for fewer acronyms
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 06:30:52 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

A recent poster wrote:

>amp would never pass FCC TA
>requirements


------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

It took me a while to figure out what "TA" means in the above - Type 
Acceptance.

Please guys, fewer acronyms! Unless you're sure your readers will 
know the acronym without hesitation, type it out. Only takes a second 
or two and will avoid much consternation.

Thanks,

Bill, W6WRT

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>