Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Mica cap substitute \ alternative

To: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Mica cap substitute \ alternative
From: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 04:55:48 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
The information on mica capacitor current ratings came from a guy  
called "Lenk" in Oceanside, California,  At the time of the caveat  
from Lenk, I was shopping for RF padder caps.   As I recall, Lenk's  
last name was Lenkert.  He and an older mostly-retired fellow owned  
an electronic emporium that specialized in surplus transmitting  
components.  A small part of the store was devoted to a mini-museum  
of early transmitting apparatus.  As I recall, in a glass display  
case, he had an airborne spark transceiver from WW-I.


On Jul 13, 2006, at 4:13 AM, Tom W8JI wrote:

>  So we are  told that some manufacturers derate some mica
> caps above 5MHz. Others have caps that in slightly different
> applications have ratings that are high. Some mica caps can
> handle high currents in the VHF range. Dissipation factor
> wouldn't, prima facie. seem to be the critical parameter
> between all these products.

Dissipation factor is related to dielectric heating, and internal  
heat is seemingly a factor in capacitor life.

>> I can't say that I'm any the wiser - possibly a little
>> better informed.
>> 73
>> Peter G3RZP
>
> Here's something I noticed about technical questions or
> topics.  If someone gives a simple authoritative answer that
> everyone can just accept on the surface without having to
> understand the actual problem, it gets accepted.

I did not accept what Lenk told me unquestioningly.  Instead, I went  
home and dug through a junk box of WW-II surplus mica transmitting  
caps.  When I saw that current rating decreased as frequency  
increased, I concluded that Lenk knew what he was talking about.

> That seems
> to be true even when the answer is so grossly oversimplified
> it winds up being wrong in the big picture.
>
> I think it is rooted in wanted an answer without learning
> how something really works.

I agree, Tom.
>
> 73 Tom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>

R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734
r@somis.org



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>