Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] crossmodulation in PA ? Thanks for all good??advice

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] crossmodulation in PA ? Thanks for all good??advice
From: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@pclink.com>
Reply-to: Robert Chudek <k0rc@pclink.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 10:47:06 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
This misplaced bonding effort applies to bonding around a rotator as well. We 
already dispelled the myth (on the TowerTalk reflector) of rotator bearnings 
being welded by a lightning strike. Common sense tells us the rotator is 
protected by a Faraday shield anyway (the tower).

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN


---------------Original thread---------------

Message: 6
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 07:11:41 -0400
From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] crossmodulation in PA ? Thanks for all good
??advice
To: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>, "Nils Petter Pedersen"
<la7sl@online.no>
Cc: amps@contesting.com
Message-ID: <002b01c7f13f$e37c3430$640fa8c0@radioroom>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original

Hi Colin,

>I mentioned this morning that I had some question about the 
>copper bonding
> across the tower joints, and raised the question that it 
> could create
> corrosion.  Copper has a .35 volt potential and 
> hot-dip-zinc has a 1.20 volt
> potential.  Even though the tower is bolted together with 
> bolts, there is a
> process called "fretting" that can  cause corrosion to 
> occur between the
> metals that are otherwise solidly joined.

My point was that with rare exception bonding a tower joint 
is a waste of time. There are tens or hundreds of thousands 
of sheer pressure on the bolts in a typical cross-bolted 
tower joint.

While I agree dissimilar metals should be avoided, placing 
them across a tower joint is meaningless. How good would the 
diode be if it is shorted end-to-end with what we could 
consider a zero ohm connection? The same is true for 
lightning. Lightning doesn't care a bit if the joints are 
bridged or not.

There are some rumors that bonding the joints helps things, 
but they probably came from looking at early broadcast 
towers with pad joints. In many cases those joints would 
have brazed connections jumpering the joint, but in later 
installations that was practice abandoned after it was found 
unnecessary. This probably spawned the idea Hams should 
jumper joints. Anyone who thinks a couple stainless steel 
clamps with a few dozen pounds per square inch clamping 
force will significantly change the connectivity in a joint 
bearing tens of thousands of pounds force probably hasn't 
thought about the system.

It really is meaningless. The possible exception is in 
systems ready to fall down anyway.

73 Tom

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>