Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] stability of amps

To: "Samuel Strongin" <kf4yox@embarqmail.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] stability of amps
From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:26:58 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
The Vega was fine once they switched to the Pontiac Iron Duke engine. Rust 
out was not an engineering issue, strictly cheapskates in the front office. 
Lots of nice south west examples are up here as summer drivers, some with V8 
conversions.

Pintos also.

The Yugo was something altogether atrocious from every respect.

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Samuel Strongin" <kf4yox@embarqmail.com>
To: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; 
<g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] stability of amps


>  If everyone can remember the GM Vega it was repeated,but was still 
> terrible engineering, So much for logic.
>                                                         73 kf4yox
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
> To: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; 
> <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 8:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] stability of amps
>
>
>> If its repeatable it is called engineering. If it works once and then you
>> write an article about how smart you are that is called something else.
>>
>> I see that the Ameritron AL-572 that you may have worked on required
>> neutraliztion. Looks to be a copy of the 1960's Heath Warrior.
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
>> To: <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; <amps@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 8:17 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] stability of amps
>>
>>
>>>> Does anyone have the s (or y or z) parameterts of the 572B
>>>> at frequencies up to 50 MHz and beyond? This would tell
>>>> you the potential stability.
>>>> My experience with 572Bs  is that they are a real wotsit
>>>> at 10 metres anyway, and personally,. I'd avoid them like
>>>> the plague
>>>
>>> I would too, but that's because I like to use a tube on a
>>> frequency where it is very stable and predictable. That
>>> means well below the self-neutralizing frequency...not
>>> above.
>>>
>>> I once made sweep tubes operate on 6 meters as a bet from
>>> someone at Amp Supply, and then the things went into
>>> production!!!
>>>
>>> In many cases if we find a lucky recipe it can be repeated.
>>> That shouldn't be confused with engineering.
>>>
>>> 73 Tom
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Amps mailing list
>>> Amps@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>