Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 6 mtrs:

To: w8ji@contesting.com, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] 6 mtrs:
From: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:58:45 EDT
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
 
In a message dated 9/25/2007 7:46:39 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
w8ji@contesting.com writes:

There's  nothing wrong with what you are doing except when 
you extend the fact you  got lucky to mean it's a great idea 
and the rest of the world is  substandard.

73 Tom




Tom, I don't want to argue about this point, and I don't mean to blow my  
whistle and I usually don't.  I am sorry if my thoughts on the subject seem  to 
reflect the above captioned statement of yours.  But I must say the  thought of 
me meaning that others are substandard is wrong.  I never said  anybody was 
sub standard, I said they get frustrated and jump to  conclusions.  I think 
there is a difference here and that should be pointed  out.  Carl has been 
doing 
Sb-200 conversions much longer than I have and I  would like to know what he 
has to say about all this.  You seem to feel  that what we do is a compiled 
error compensated design, I don't feel that  way.  I want to know how Carl 
feels 
about that.  I am sure he will get  in here and make a better technical 
argument than I will.  
 
I want to add one thing, In my everyday work which I have been doing for 37  
years I thought I knew it all and seen it all, but not too long ago someone  
showed me something that I thought was virtually impossible in my field.   
Something that I had professed as a professional  for all that time was BS,  I 
saw 
it happen and I have to humble myself to say, someone finally did what I  
thought was impossible.  HOW?  Through a technique I would have never  dreamed 
of 
on my own.  Go figure.  73 Lou



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>