Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner

To: <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner
From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:48:05 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Chadwick" <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 6:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner


> Lou,
>>Peter, Why in Gods name would you disagree with what I said about adding 6 
>>meters to an HF SB-200 and then make the above statement? Do you just like 
>>being contrary?  The last thing I would do is want to send someone down 
>>that road.  For heaven sakes.  Lou<
>
> This must be the subtleties in meanings that occur from time to time 
> between English English and American English. Your comment was that some 
> articles had suggested this: I was hardly disagreeing with you. More like 
> violent agreement.
>
> But I could conceive of an amplifier design starting from scratch that 
> might manage to do it with some clever mechanics in the switching. But 
> then, I wouldn't use 572Bs in it.
>
> 73
> Peter G3RZP


Peter, just what would you consider a good economical tube if building from 
scratch for 6M? Ive not seen any REAL verified IMD numbers published for any 
Russian tubes except maybe the 4CX800 and have hesitated in even trying one.

Carl
KM1H




 _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>