Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner

To: <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner
From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:48:02 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I dont follow your statement Peter or is it a language problem again? (;

Tom repeatedly bashes the super cathode circuit and Bill Orr in particular.

Yet you say it suggests excellent IMD re: Pappenfus.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Chadwick" <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] New SB-200 owner


> K1KP tells me:
>
> ..>.the KWS-1 *does* have negative feedback, where a portion of the PA 
> output
> is fed back to the driver cathode...<
> Tnx Tony. sri, my mistake.
> Pappenfus suggests that super cathode driven operation works well with the 
> 4CX1000 and the 4CX250, allowing very good IMD. The circuit is of course 
> similar to the 'neutralised, not directly grounded grid  triode circuit' 
> that Tom has told us about. Before the flames start,  please note that 
> this is amother area where I do NOT disagree with Tom.
> Despite the fact that I fail to believe that us heretics who don't believe 
> in nichrome will actually burn in hell for eternity!
> 73
> Peter G3RZP
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>