All these years, I've been believing people like Tom, Carl and Ian and even
myself that the SWR on a tranismission line, is, other than the change caused
by losses, independent of length. Now I read in the QRP column of the October
CQ that you should trim your transmission line length for minimum SWR.
Now, if it's in CQ, it must be right, OK?
The same edition has a one tube CW rig with no mention of the fact that a Tri
tet oscillator having the cathode tuned to thw crystal frequency when the plate
is so tuned is a notorious production of a 'rock crusher' signal - the
crystals don't last too long.
Now, if it's in CQ, it must be right, OK?
But people like Tom and Carl and even Rich Measures never said so!!
OK, so sarcasm is the lowest form of wit....
73
Peter G3RZP
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|