Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Caddock power resistors

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Caddock power resistors
From: "Nils Petter Pedersen" <la7sl@online.no>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:44:53 +0100
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Tnx for info George !
They can be useful in a number of RF power applications then !
I was worried about stray capacitance forming a RC
network all through the resistor. This info is useful for me
TNX
Peter
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <gdaught6@stanford.edu>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Caddock power resistors


> On 13 Nov 2007 at 19:55, Nils Petter Pedersen wrote about:
>
> And so did KM1H, and K9YC, with many snips:
>
>> The problem with the TO-packaged units is that they MUST have a good
>> heatsink.
>
>> > I never heard of them before. I see that Mouser
>> > carries the 100W version in stock. Ive just ordered a pair of 100 Ohm 
>> > from
>> > Mouser and will see how they look for RF as well as how they hold up at
>> > power in a Heath Cantenna..
>
> I used some Caddock power resistors in the grid circuit of the
> "Sunnyvale/Saint Petersburg Kilowatt Plus" that appears in the 1999-
> 2004 ARRL handbooks.  They are mounted on a pretty big heat sink, and
> have their own fan.  This setup has been very satisfactory, and
> capacitance hasn't been a problem.
>
> The amplifier gets serious contest use, and hasn't had any problems.
>
> 73,
>
> George T. Daughters, K6GT
> See you in the California QSO Party (CQP)
> October 6-7, 2007
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.30/1127 - Release Date: 
> 12.11.2007 21:19
>
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>