Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] filament supply D.C or A.C

To: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>, <erniaba@netvision.net.il>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] filament supply D.C or A.C
From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:01:10 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
When in doubt ask the manufacturer. Transmitting tube filaments come in 
thoriated tungsten and oxide coated; trying to compare all against a panel 
lamp is rather ridiculous.

I can see the benefit of  regulated DC on receivers and audio amps however. 
Ive gone that route with many "boatanchors" that Ive rebuilt and use 
regularly.

Carl
KM1H

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
To: <erniaba@netvision.net.il>; <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] filament supply D.C or A.C


>I remember reading the same test about the ac on filaments.  I recall the
> test was run because the lamp manufacturer specified a long life bulb and 
> an
> aircraft manufacturer installed them and found substantially less life in
> the aircraft than specified.  The lamp manufacturer ran the test, and
> changed the long life specifications to ac.
>
> There are some examples of dc on filaments, however.  Almost all of the WW
> II aircraft radio equipment ran on dc - and many are still running (often 
> on
> ac, however).  However, the war was relatively short while amateurs 
> expect
> their tubes to last 30 or 40 years.  Radios from the 20s all ran on
> batteries, and many of those tubes are still running.
>
> Some say that if you run the tube on dc, you should alternate the polarity
> of the filament every so often, to offset the migration problem.
>
> There are other things that may apply to the equation, however.  DC is
> easier to regulate, and may be easier to ramp up for a controlled start.
> Also, the more you otherwise abuse the tube, the less important the 
> filament
> is.  For example, if you overdrive it, under-cool it or overload it, the
> filament source becomes less important - because the tube is less likely 
> to
> fail because of filament failure and more likely to fail for other causes.
>
> 73,  Colin  K7FM
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>