Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] W3NQN band pass filters

To: "Alton McConnell Avon-Cadillac" <amcconnell@avonauto.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] W3NQN band pass filters
From: Karl-Arne Markström <sm0aom@telia.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:43:30 +0200
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
First, I would suggest that you check that the indicated return loss is > 30 
dB when the MFJ-269 is terminated with a known good 50 ohm termination.

It is difficult to optimise return loss performance when aligning a filter 
only in the transmission domain,
so if return loss is of concern, I would suggest the use of a network 
analyser (scalar or vector) that can display both transmission and 
reflection, preferably at the same time.

>From a practical standpoint, 20 dB return loss does not affect system 
performance significantly.

73/

Karl-Arne
SM0AOM

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alton McConnell Avon-Cadillac" <amcconnell@avonauto.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 2:03 PM
Subject: [Amps] W3NQN band pass filters


>I am trying to align some W3NQN band pass filters that I have built for
> club use. I am using the design from the May and June 1998 QST article.
>
> I am using a HP 8656 Signal generator and a 30 MHz scope for the tuning.
> Measuring the return loss with a MFJ 269 SWR analyzer, the best that I
> can do is 20db.
>
> Any suggestions for alignment of the filters?
>
> Alton, NU8L
> Amcconnell3@hotmail.com
>
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of Avon 
> Automotive, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the 
> individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one 
> of the named recipients or otherwise have reason to believe that you have 
> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete this 
> message immediately. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, 
> printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
>
> The views, opinions, conclusions and other informations expressed in this 
> electronic mail are neither given nor endorsed by Avon Automotive unless 
> otherwise indicated by an authorized representative independent of this 
> message.
>
>
> This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. 
> www.surfcontrol.com
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1497 - Release Date: 2008-06-11 
08:32

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>