Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum?

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum?
From: "Pete Lancashire" <pete@petelancashire.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:35:52 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I would toss in, neither. If anything go to fully min or max
and then back off a couple of turns.

Also consider buying a double or triple wall corrugated box,
if I was the buyer I would be glad to pay the cost.

-pete


> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:59:23 -0700 (PDT), Robert Groh
> <rgroh@swbell.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>Comments and advice welcome. The vacuum variables are Jennings UCS and
>> UCSL, by the way, if that matters.
>
> REPLY:
>
> That's a very good question Robert, but I think the best way is to
> pack them so well it doesn't matter. I'm not trying to be a smarty
> here, it's just that they are so delicate in any configuration that
> you can't hardly have too much foam around them. The box should be
> many times larger than the capacitor and well stuffed.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>