Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: dezrat1242@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:33:44 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:04:20 -0400, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:

>
>My conversation was about 22 years ago. Thats how long the voodo science 
>parasitic farce has been going on.

REPLY:

22 years ago was years before Rich began his crusade about nichrome parasitic
suppressors. Please explain how that Eimac engineer could have blamed Rich for
such wholesale destruction of 8877's long before any of Rich's articles appeared
in QST.

And while you're at it, please explain how any of Rich's mods could damage a
tube in the first place. That's what I really want to hear. 

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>