Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques
From: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:05:36 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Measures was laying groundwork for his 1988-89 articles in the mid 80's.
That should be close to 22 years + or - a few blown 3-500s.

Don WA4NPL






Quoting "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>:

> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:04:20 -0400, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> My conversation was about 22 years ago. Thats how long the voodo science
>> parasitic farce has been going on.
>
> REPLY:
>
> 22 years ago was years before Rich began his crusade about nichrome parasitic
> suppressors. Please explain how that Eimac engineer could have  
> blamed Rich for
> such wholesale destruction of 8877's long before any of Rich's  
> articles appeared
> in QST.
>
> And while you're at it, please explain how any of Rich's mods could damage a
> tube in the first place. That's what I really want to hear.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>