Let me try this...........
At 04:22 PM 10/4/2009, Jack Parker wrote:
>Amen, George! I had just that experience with the ICOM reflector. Nothing
>untoward got to the list, just a business transaction, but I did *not* check
>the address(es) first before hitting send...just not used to that
>configuration.
>
>
>On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello George,
> >
> > I like it the way it is.....people just have to be disciplined to using
> > "reply all" when they want their response to go to the list...which they
> > should in most cases. I've always made it a habit to always check the
> > addresses I'm sending e-mail to before I hit "send".
> >
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Gary K9GS
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > K9GS
> > Gary Schwartz email: k9gs (at) arrl.net
> > Check out K9NS on the web: http://www.k9ns.com
> > Society of Midwest Contesters (SMC) http://www.w9smc.com/
> > GMDXA http://www.eng.mu.edu/gmdxa/
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "George Fremin III" <geoiii@kkn.net>
> > To: <amps@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 11:40 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Amps] Suggestion.....
> >
> >
> > > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 12:27:20PM -0500, Jim Dawson wrote:
> > >
> > >> Can we change this group so when you click "Reply" in your mail
> > >> client it goes to the group and not to the individual? If it is
> > >> important enough to post to the group, most likely so is the
> > >> response. Jim - K9DD
> > >
> > >
> > > Since I am the "list owner" (which does not mean much really) I will
> > > weigh in here and say that I do not feel that would be a good change
> > > and I would not make that change without almost everyone on the list
> > > agreeing to such a change.
> > >
> > > To further expand on it a bit, in my experience as the mailman admin
> > > and a system admin for lists.contesting.com and for another domain
> > > that hosts 500 email lists I can tell you that, in general, the
> > > 'reply-to list' option can be the cause of more trouble in the form of
> > > private messages going to the list than it is ever worth. It almost
> > > always results in unintended personal attacks or private information
> > > being posted to a list. In addition I feel that it lowers the signal
> > > to noise ratio of a list since replies that really do not benefit the
> > > list as a whole get broadcast to the list by default. I think it is a
> > > good thing that posting to a list of hundreds or thousands of people
> > > be more difficult than hitting the default reply button and typing.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > George Fremin III - K5TR
> > > geoiii@kkn.net
> > > http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Amps mailing list
> > > Amps@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> >
>
>
>
>--
>Jack, W6NF
>Silver Springs, NV
>DM09ji
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>signature database 4479 (20091004) __________
>
>The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
>http://www.eset.com
Bill Russell
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|