Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L

To: <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:01:05 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Some of us prefer manual amps that can often be fixed on the fly.  Others 
prefer sending the amp back for service;  many are not even operator 
servicable.

Maybe when I enter my senile years I'll need a microprocessor controlled amp 
too.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L


> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:51:17 EDT, CAA357@aol.com wrote:
>
>>
>>Give the selection between: SB-220 with all of the Harbach upgrades,
>>Clipperton L with new power supply board and recently acquired AMP-Supply
>>LK500-NTC looks mint however not yet tested.  How would you rate each of 
>>these
>>amps and which one would you keep?
>
> REPLY:
>
> My recommendation - dead serious - sell them all and get a good used 
> Alpha, any
> of the 80 or 90 series.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>