| To: | "'Carl'" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>, <n8de@thepoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L |
| From: | "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com> |
| Reply-to: | philc@texascellnet.com |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:09:14 -0500 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
> Subject: Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L > > Whats the required age to attain geezer status? > > Carl > KM1H It is more of a state of mind, Carl! (((73))) Phil, K5PC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L, Carl |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L, mikea |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L, Carl |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] LK-500-NTC v. SB-220 v. Clipperrton L, Pete Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |