Hi Paul,
I didn't mean that I didn't understand the 2nd paragraph but that I didn't
read it. I just overlooked it when I read your first post with it.
I do think that you have the cooling requirements wrong for the 3CX800
though. I got the info from the 2000 ARRL handbook section on amplifiers.
There is a table there that list the cooling requirements.
The cooling requirements are the same per watt of dissipation for the 8877
as they are for the 3CX800.
By the way I see that I made a type in one place where I show .03333 cu
ft/watt. It should be .02333 cu ft/watt.
At 400 watts dissipation each they should require around (.02333 x 400) 9.3
cu ft of air each or 18.6 for a pair for 800 watts dissipation.
A single 3CX800 operated at 800 watts dissipation would require 19 cu ft of
air per the chart at .5 back pressure.
73
Gary K4FMX
_____
From: Paul Decker [mailto:kg7hf@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 6:26 PM
To: garyschafer@comcast.net
Cc: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Advice
Hi Gary,
The point of the second paragraph was that with a pair tubes operating under
their specificed dissipation rating require less cooling then a single tube
operating at or above its dissipation range.
Two 3cx800's operating at legal limit only require 12 CFM at about 0.09 -
0.1" of back pressure, this is because the tubes are only operating at 400W
dissipation each.
Paul Decker (KG7HF)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
To: garyschafer@comcast.net, "Paul Decker" <kg7hf@comcast.net>,
amps@contesting.com
Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2009 5:11:10 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [Amps] Advice
Paul, sorry I missed your second paragraph.
Air flow needed depends on how much power is being dissipated. If you divide
the airflow by the dissipation rating of the 8877 as an example 35/1500 =
.02333 cu ft/watt. multiply that by 1600 (for a pair of 3CX800s) and you get
37.3 cu ft of air flow. The cooling efficiency of both are about the same
.02333 cu ft/watt.
So if you ran the pair of 3CX800s at the same power level as the 3CX1500 it
would require just about the same amount of air flow. .03333 x 1500 on the
pair of 3CX800s = 35 cu ft.
I don't know what the back pressure would look like on the pair of 3CX800s
at reduced air flow but it would probably be pretty close to the 3CX1500.
73
Gary K4FMX
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of Gary Schafer
> Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 4:40 PM
> To: 'Paul Decker'; amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Advice
>
> The chart that I am looking at says: 8877 requires 35 cu ft at .41 back
> pressure.
>
> A 3CX800A7 requires 19 cu ft at .5 back pressure. Two of those would
> require
> 38 cu ft at .5 back pressure.
>
> 73
> Gary K4FMX
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com]
> > On Behalf Of Paul Decker
> > Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 4:26 PM
> > To: amps@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [Amps] Advice
> >
> >
> >
> > When I was writing the original reply I was thinking more along the
> > lines of different tubes for example a single 8877 requires more
> airflow
> > and has more back pressure than two 3cx800's.
> >
> >
> >
> > Agreed, two tubes of the same type would require more airflow than a
> > single tube. However, I think we could assume that two tubes of the
> > same type would produce 2x the power of the single tube amp. If the
> > twin tube amp were run at the same output as the single holer, it
> would
> > also follow to reason the airflow requirements could for the two holer
> > could be reduced because each tube is only being driven to a reduced
> > output.
> >
> >
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gary Schafer" < garyschafer@comcast.net >
> > To: < dezrat1242@yahoo.com >; < amps@contesting.com >
> > Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 11:04 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Amps] Advice
> >
> >
> > There is no free lunch. While it may seem like you could get by with
> > less
> > air flow it doesn't follow.
> > A pair of tubes will require twice the air flow at the same back
> > pressure as
> > a single tube. Tubes being the same of course.
> >
> > 73
> > Gary K4FMX
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|