Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] which HV connector to use?]

To: "amps@contesting.com >> 'AMPS'" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] which HV connector to use?]
From: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@onetel.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:14:59 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Edward Swynar wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> Yes, as Alex correctly points-out, this topic HAS been round the oval at
> least once before...! Hi Hi
> 
> ...And as before, I *still* maintain that you can't do much better than to
> employ good-quality (as in "made in the USA") PL-259's, SO-239's, & RG-8 /
> RG-11 coaxial cable for your inter-equipment B+ wiring & connections...
> 
> Just remember to NEVER EVER leave the exposed centre pin of the
> amplifier-side PL-259 , well, exposed!!! At least not while the p.s. is
> activated, & the other end of the jumper cable might still be connected to
> same...!
> 
> I've used the coax jumper route for some 33 years here now, & have not had
> any issues. PERIOD. Best of all, the hardware is all commonly available,
> too...
> 
> ~73!~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ

With all due respect, using SO239/PL259 seems about the silliest suggestion I 
have ever heard. I'm not saying the insulation may be insufficient on some 
models made in the USA when they are mated, but the chance of an accident must 
be considerably higher with those sort of connectors than just about anything 
else in a ham shack. They are not designed for that sort of use.

Where several kV are concerned, is not the place to start skimping to save a 
few 
dollars.

dave
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>