Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] Bill's novel idea of parasitic suppression.

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] Bill's novel idea of parasitic suppression.
From: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 02:41:59 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
 Bill,  wrt had mentioned abt using a variable cap in series with a coil, in 
series with a resistor, all wired between 
cathode and chassis, to eliminate parasitics.   I think the idea of the 
resistor was to broaden the parasitic freq response.

Ok, between  low C  and high L..... and  at the other extreme, High C.. and Low 
L... there is an infinite amount of combo's
that would still resonate on the parasitic freq.   Which combo would provide 
the widest BW ??   I think it would be the 
low C, High L  combo.. but not sure ?     Has anybody tried  this b4 ?   On 
paper, it looks like it would work.... and no
resistor required.    It would amount to a series resonant tuned circuit... and 
should suck out the parasitic freq.   

I saw a 50 mhz amp in one of the books, where instead of using a doorknob  for 
a screen bypass cap, they used a 
coil and variable cap in series, from screen to chassis.  This was supposed to 
make for a better RF grnd at 50 mhz, than
the usual doorknob bypass cap.  Same idea,  different application. 

later...... Jim  VE7RF       
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>